Webb21 maj 2024 · FACTS OF RANJIT UDESHI V STATE OF MAHARASHTRA. A bookstore owner, Ranjit D. Udeshi was charged with possession and selling of obscene material … WebbIn this case, S. Khushboo published an article in India Today and Dhina Thanthi, in which she supports pre-marital sex in the context of life in the relationship, which is opposed by …
S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal & Anr on 28 April, 2010
WebbOn 23.03.2010 the Hon’ble SC in S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal ii case opined that a man and woman living together without marriage can’t be interpreted as an offense. “At the point … WebbS Khushboo v. Kanniammal 2010. The Supreme Court of India for the very first time in the case of S Khushboo v. Kanniammal 2010 gave legal recognition to live in relationships … bing als startseite windows 10
S. Khushboo vs. Kanniammal and Anr. (28.04.2010 - SC)
WebbTABLE OF CASES Dinohamy v. W. L. Blahamy AIR 1927 PC 185 Minaxi Zaverbhai Jethva v. the State of Gujarat Special Civil Appeal No.3708 of 1998 ... S. Khushboo v. Kanniammal … Webb1 sep. 2024 · In the case of S. Khushboo vs Kanniammal (2010) the Supreme Court of India held that there is no legal provision where adults are voluntarily associated in sexual relationships other than marriage, and therefore it does not violate any law. The Court further referred to the case of Lata Singh vs State Of U.P. Webb19 sep. 2024 · The law should not be put in such a way that it will affect free speech and free expression of one person was also upheld in case S Khushboo v. Kanniammal. In … cytocraft biotech